We should focus on the biases that matter: a reply to commentaries

DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2013.06.001zbMATH Open1285.91109OpenAlexW2085375132MaRDI QIDQ2437272FDOQ2437272

Authors: Gregory Francis 

Publication date: 3 March 2014

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2013.06.001

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15) Mathematical psychology (91E99)

Cites Work

• On biases in assessing replicability, statistical consistency and publication bias
• Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
• The consistency test may be too weak to be useful: its systematic application would not improve effect size estimation in meta-analyses
• It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013)
• The consistency test does not -- and cannot -- deliver what is advertised: a comment on Francis (2013)
• Clarifications on the application and interpretation of the test for excess significance and its extensions
• Interrogating \(p\)-values

Cited In (2)

• The importance of being biased
• Observing biases in the state: case studies with Trivium and Trivia-SC

This page was built for publication: We should focus on the biases that matter: a reply to commentaries

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2437272)