Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias

DOI10.1016/j.jmp.2013.02.003zbMath1285.91108MaRDI QIDQ2437263

Gregory Francis

Publication date: 3 March 2014

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2013.02.003

zbMATH Keywords

hypothesis testing; statistics; scientific publishing; publication bias

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

91E99: Mathematical psychology

62P15: Applications of statistics to psychology

Related Items

The consistency test may be too weak to be useful: its systematic application would not improve effect size estimation in meta-analyses, It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013), The consistency test does not -- and cannot -- deliver what is advertised: a comment on Francis (2013), Clarifications on the application and interpretation of the test for excess significance and its extensions, Interrogating \(p\)-values, We should focus on the biases that matter: a reply to commentaries

Uses Software

• R
• pwr
• BUGS

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
• Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis
• Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias
• Fixed-Sample-Size Analysis of Sequential Observations