Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias

DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2013.02.003zbMATH Open1285.91108OpenAlexW2168553771MaRDI QIDQ2437263FDOQ2437263

Gregory Francis

Publication date: 3 March 2014

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2013.02.003

Recommendations

• The consistency test does not -- and cannot -- deliver what is advertised: a comment on Francis (2013)
• On biases in assessing replicability, statistical consistency and publication bias
• Statistical methods for replicability assessment
• \(p_{\text{rep}}\): an agony in five fits
• Statistical proof? The problem of irreproducibility

zbMATH Keywords

hypothesis testingpublication biasstatisticsscientific publishing

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15) Mathematical psychology (91E99)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis
• Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Fixed-Sample-Size Analysis of Sequential Observations
• Introduction to Meta‐Analysis

Cited In (12)

• Clarifications on the application and interpretation of the test for excess significance and its extensions
• It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013)
• Interrogating \(p\)-values
• The consistency test may be too weak to be useful: its systematic application would not improve effect size estimation in meta-analyses
• The consistency test does not -- and cannot -- deliver what is advertised: a comment on Francis (2013)
• We should focus on the biases that matter: a reply to commentaries
• Method in experiment: rhetoric and reality
• Variation and Covariation in Large-Scale Replication Projects: An Evaluation of Replicability
• What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman-Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications
• How redefining statistical significance can worsen the replication crisis
• On the impossibility of empirical controls of scientific theories-from the point of view of a psychologist
• Replication study design: confidence intervals and commentary

Uses Software

• R
• pwr
• BUGS

This page was built for publication: Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2437263)