What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman-Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications

DOI10.1007/s11229-019-02433-0OpenAlexW2980553079WikidataQ127018355 ScholiaQ127018355MaRDI QIDQ2695385

Mark A. Rubin

Publication date: 31 March 2023

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02433-0

zbMATH Keywords

type I errorFisherdirect replicationNeyman-Pearsonreplication crisisexact replication

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Philosophy of statistics.
• Frequentist probability and frequentist statistics
• The emperor's new tests. (With comments and a rejoinder).
• Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? (With comments and a rejoinder).
• R. A. Fisher and the fiducial argument
• A defence of subjective fiducial inference
• Some Problems Connected with Statistical Inference
• Fiducial Inference
• Statistical Evidence
• The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Theories of Testing Hypotheses: One Theory or Two?
• Reconsidering the Fundamental Contributions of Fisher and Neyman on Experimentation and Sampling
• IX. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses
• The widespread misinterpretation ofp-values as error probabilities
• Fiducial and Confidence Distributions for Real Exponential Families
• Severe Testing as a Basic Concept in a Neyman–Pearson Philosophy of Induction
• On the Necessity for Random Sampling
• Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”

This page was built for publication: What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman-Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications