The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Theories of Testing Hypotheses: One Theory or Two?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4292101
DOI10.2307/2291263zbMath0805.62023OpenAlexW4239974415MaRDI QIDQ4292101
Publication date: 10 July 1994
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2291263
powerinductive inferenceconditional inferenceBehrens-Fisher problem\(p\)-valueshistorical backgroundcomparison of two binomialsfixed levels of significanceinductive behavior
Related Items
Revisiting noncentrality-based confidence intervals, error probabilities and estimation-based effect sizes, Model Selection Using Conditional Densities, Constrained Bayesian Rules for Testing Statistical Hypotheses, On defining \(P\)-values, A semiparametric model for hyperspectral anomaly detection, Intrinsic losses, Effect magnitude: a different focus, Statistical properties of $b$-adic diaphonies, Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective, Randomized statistical inference: a unified statistical inference frame of frequentist, fiducial, and Bayesian inference, Interpreting tests of a hypothesis at multiple alpha levels within a Neyman-Pearson framework, What is a Randomization Test?, SGR modeling of correlational effects in fake good self-report measures, What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman-Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications, Incorporating external information in analyses of clinical trials with binary outcomes, A tutorial on statistically sound pattern discovery, Marginal information for expectation parameters, The emperor's new tests. (With comments and a rejoinder)., Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? (With comments and a rejoinder)., Robust methods to detect disease-genotype association in genetic association studies: calculate \(p\)-values using exact conditional enumeration instead of simulated permutations or asymptotic approximations, The Highest Confidence Density Region and Its Usage for Joint Inferences about Constrained Parameters, Inference for negativist theory using numerically computed rejection regions, Combining information from independent sources through confidence distributions, Critique of p‐Values, Multi-Aspect Procedures for Paired Data with Application to Biometric Morphing, Comparison of the \(p\)-value and posterior probability, Before p < 0.05 to Beyond p < 0.05: Using History to Contextualize p-Values and Significance Testing
