p_rep: an agony in five fits
From MaRDI portal
Publication:734670
DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2008.09.004zbMATH Open1187.91172OpenAlexW2108772707WikidataQ57710691 ScholiaQ57710691MaRDI QIDQ734670FDOQ734670
Authors: Geoffrey J. Iverson, Michael D. Lee, Shunan Zhang, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Publication date: 13 October 2009
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.09.004
Recommendations
- Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
- On biases in assessing replicability, statistical consistency and publication bias
- The widespread misinterpretation of \(p\)-values as error probabilities
- Statistical methods for replicability assessment
- The \(p\)-value case, a review of the debate: issues and plausible remedies
Cites Work
Cited In (5)
- Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
- Statistical Guidance to Authors at Top-Ranked Journals across Scientific Disciplines
- On biases in assessing replicability, statistical consistency and publication bias
- Statistical methods for replicability assessment
- What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman-Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications
This page was built for publication: \(p_{\text{rep}}\): an agony in five fits
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q734670)