p_rep: an agony in five fits
From MaRDI portal
Publication:734670
Recommendations
- Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
- On biases in assessing replicability, statistical consistency and publication bias
- The widespread misinterpretation of \(p\)-values as error probabilities
- Statistical methods for replicability assessment
- The p-value case, a review of the debate: issues and plausible remedies
Cited in
(5)- Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
- Statistical Guidance to Authors at Top-Ranked Journals across Scientific Disciplines
- On biases in assessing replicability, statistical consistency and publication bias
- Statistical methods for replicability assessment
- What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman-Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications
This page was built for publication: \(p_{\text{rep}}\): an agony in five fits
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q734670)