p_rep: an agony in five fits

DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2008.09.004zbMATH Open1187.91172OpenAlexW2108772707WikidataQ57710691 ScholiaQ57710691MaRDI QIDQ734670FDOQ734670

Authors: Geoffrey J. Iverson, Michael D. Lee, Shunan Zhang, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers 

Publication date: 13 October 2009

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.09.004

Recommendations

• Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
• On biases in assessing replicability, statistical consistency and publication bias
• The widespread misinterpretation of \(p\)-values as error probabilities
• Statistical methods for replicability assessment
• The \(p\)-value case, a review of the debate: issues and plausible remedies

zbMATH Keywords

\(p_{\text{rep}}\)posterior predictionprobability of replication

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15) Measurement and performance in psychology (91E45)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (5)

• Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
• Statistical Guidance to Authors at Top-Ranked Journals across Scientific Disciplines
• On biases in assessing replicability, statistical consistency and publication bias
• Statistical methods for replicability assessment
• What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman-Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications

This page was built for publication: \(p_{\text{rep}}\): an agony in five fits

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q734670)