On biases in assessing replicability, statistical consistency and publication bias

DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2013.04.003zbMATH Open1285.91112OpenAlexW2077641743MaRDI QIDQ2437268FDOQ2437268

Authors: V. Johnson 

Publication date: 3 March 2014

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2013.04.003

Recommendations

• Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
• Statistical methods for replicability assessment
• The consistency test does not -- and cannot -- deliver what is advertised: a comment on Francis (2013)
• Discussion on quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis
• \(p_{\text{rep}}\): an agony in five fits

zbMATH Keywords

publication biasBayes factorssignificance testsuniformly most powerful Bayesian testsexcess of significant findings

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15) Mathematical psychology (91E99)

Cites Work

• Uniformly most powerful Bayesian tests

Cited In (13)

• Clarifications on the application and interpretation of the test for excess significance and its extensions
• It really just does not follow, comments on Francis (2013)
• The consistency test does not -- and cannot -- deliver what is advertised: a comment on Francis (2013)
• Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias
• An evaluation of statistical methods for aggregate patterns of replication failure
• We should focus on the biases that matter: a reply to commentaries
• Improving the conduct and reporting of statistical analysis in psychology. Response to the comments ``Thinking about data, research methods, and statistical analyses and ``Encourage playing with data and discourage questionable reporting practices provided in response to ``Playing with data -- or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right
• \(p_{\text{rep}}\): an agony in five fits
• Statistical methods for replicability assessment
• A Bound for Publication Bias Based on the Fraction of Unpublished Studies
• Using Journal Impact Factors to Correct for the Publication Bias of Medical Studies
• How redefining statistical significance can worsen the replication crisis
• Statistical proof? The problem of irreproducibility

This page was built for publication: On biases in assessing replicability, statistical consistency and publication bias

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2437268)