Two optimal strategies for active learning of causal models from interventional data

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2440180

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2013.11.007zbMATH Open1390.68530arXiv1205.4174OpenAlexW2162690533MaRDI QIDQ2440180FDOQ2440180


Authors: Alain Hauser, Peter Bühlmann Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 27 March 2014

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: From observational data alone, a causal DAG is only identifiable up to Markov equivalence. Interventional data generally improves identifiability; however, the gain of an intervention strongly depends on the intervention target, that is, the intervened variables. We present active learning (that is, optimal experimental design) strategies calculating optimal interventions for two different learning goals. The first one is a greedy approach using single-vertex interventions that maximizes the number of edges that can be oriented after each intervention. The second one yields in polynomial time a minimum set of targets of arbitrary size that guarantees full identifiability. This second approach proves a conjecture of Eberhardt (2008) indicating the number of unbounded intervention targets which is sufficient and in the worst case necessary for full identifiability. In a simulation study, we compare our two active learning approaches to random interventions and an existing approach, and analyze the influence of estimation errors on the overall performance of active learning.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4174




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (10)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Two optimal strategies for active learning of causal models from interventional data

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2440180)