Exploring group decision making in a power-to-take experiment

DOI10.1007/s10683-006-4310-9zbMath1132.91368OpenAlexW2103031984MaRDI QIDQ2499522

Heike Hennig-Schmidt, Ronald Bosman, Frans van Winden

Publication date: 14 August 2006

Published in: Experimental Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-4310-9

zbMATH Keywords

videoexperimentfairnessgroupsdecision rule

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Related Items (6)

Malice in the Rubinstein bargaining game ⋮ Moral entitlements and aspiration formation in asymmetric bargaining: experimental evidence from Germany and China ⋮ First- and second-order subjective expectations in strategic decision-making: experimental evidence ⋮ Who acts more like a game theorist? Group and individual play in a sequential market game and the effect of the time horizon ⋮ Emotion at stake -- the role of stake size and emotions in a power-to-take game experiment in China with a comparison to Europe ⋮ Strategic voting in heterogeneous electorates: an experimental study

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Bargaining in a video experiment. Determinants of boundedly rational behavior
• Individual and group behavior in the ultimatum game: Are groups more ``rational players?
• Are groups more (or less) consistent than individuals?
• Propagation of individual bias through group judgment: Error in the treatment of asymmetrically informative signals
• Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining
• Barking up the right tree: Are small groups rational agents?
• A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
• Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment

This page was built for publication: Exploring group decision making in a power-to-take experiment