On the number of permutatively inequivalent basic sequences in a Banach space

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2504372



Abstract: This paper contains results concerning the Borel reduction of the relation E0 of eventual agreement between sequences of 0's and 1's, to the relation of permutative equivalence between basic sequences in a Banach space. For more clarity in this abstract, we state these results in terms of classification by real numbers. If R is some (analytic) equivalence relation on a Polish space X, it is said that R is classifiable (by real numbers) if there exists a Borel map g from X into the real line such that xRx′ if and only if g(x)=g(x′). If R is not classifiable, there must be 2omega R-classes. It is conjectured that any separable Banach space such that isomorphism between its subspaces is classifiable must be isomorphic to l2. We prove the following results: - the relation simperm of permutative equivalence between normalized basic sequences is analytic non Borel, - if X is a Banach space with a Schauder basis (en), such that simperm between normalized block-sequences of X is classifiable, then X is c0 or ellp saturated for some 1leqp<+infty, - if (en) is shrinking unconditional, and simperm between normalized disjointly supported sequences in X, resp. in X∗, are classifiable, then (en) is equivalent to the unit vector basis of c0 or ellp, - if (en) is unconditional, then either X is isomorphic to l2, or X contains 2omega subspaces or 2omega quotients which are spanned by pairwise non permutatively equivalent normalized unconditional bases.


Let \(X\) be a separable infinite-dimensional Banach space with a normalized basis \((e_n)\) and let \((\mathbb{X})\) denote the set of all normalized block bases. The set of normalized disjointly supported sequences (which will be basic if the original basis is unconditional) is denoted by \((\mathcal X)\). Both sets are Polish spaces when regarded as subsets of \(X^\omega\) (product norm topology). \(E_0\) denotes the equivalence relation on \(2^\omega\) given by \(\alpha E_0\beta \Leftrightarrow \exists\;m\in\mathbb N\), \(\forall\;n\geq m\), \(\alpha (n) = \beta (n)\). Basic sequences \((x_i)\) and \((y_i)\) are permutatively equivalent if \((x_i)\) is equivalent to \((y_{\pi (i)})\) for some permutation \(\pi\) of \(\mathbb N\). \(E_0\) is Borel reducible to permutative equivalence on \((\mathbb X)\) if there exists a Borel map \(f: E_0\to (\mathbb X)\) with \(\alpha E_0 \beta \Leftrightarrow f(\alpha)\) is permutatively equivalent to \(f(\beta)\). The author proves that if \(E_0\) is not Borel reducible to permutative equivalence on \((\mathbb X)\), then there exists \(p\in [1,\infty]\) so that every block sequence of \(X\) admits a further block sequence equivalent to the unit vector basis of \(\ell_p\) (\(c_0\) if \(p=\infty\)). In the unconditional case, he shows the further block basis can be taken to be a subsequence. In the shrinking unconditional case, either \((e_n)\) is equivalent to the unit vector basis of \(\ell_p\) for some \(1<p<\infty\), or \(c_0\) or \(E_0\) is Borel reducible to permutative equivalence on at least one of \((\mathcal X)\) or \((\mathcal X^*)\). If \(X\) has an unconditional basis and is not isomorphic to \(\ell_2\), then \(X\) admits \(2^\omega\) unconditional basic sequences which are not permutatively equivalent. Other results are obtained, preceded by a long introduction concerning related results and open problems.



Cites work









This page was built for publication: On the number of permutatively inequivalent basic sequences in a Banach space

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2504372)