How well do structural demand models work? Counterfactual predictions in school choice
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2658779
Recommendations
- Demand analysis using strategic reports: an application to a school choice mechanism
- Linear demand systems are inconsistent with discrete choice
- Bounding counterfactual demand with unobserved heterogeneity and endogenous expenditures
- The empirical content of binary choice models
- Discrete choice with large choice sets
Cites work
- Choice by lexicographic semiorders
- College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage
- Demand analysis using strategic reports: an application to a school choice mechanism
- Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
- Exceptional Paper—Lexicographic Orders, Utilities and Decision Rules: A Survey
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3062534 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3085483 (Why is no real title available?)
- Machiavelli and the Gale-Shapley Algorithm
- MCMC using Hamiltonian dynamics
- Specifying and testing econometric models for rank-ordered data
- The Economics of Matching: Stability and Incentives
- Weak convergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms
Cited in
(4)- Demand analysis using strategic reports: an application to a school choice mechanism
- Purchasing seats in school choice and inequality
- Respecting priorities versus respecting preferences in school choice: when is there a trade-off?
- A stable and strategy-proof controlled school choice mechanism with integrated and flexible rules
This page was built for publication: How well do structural demand models work? Counterfactual predictions in school choice
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2658779)
