Descending the stable matching lattice: how many strategic agents are required to turn pessimality to optimality?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2670933
DOI10.1007/978-3-030-85947-3_19zbMATH Open1490.91144arXiv2007.15748OpenAlexW3203116554MaRDI QIDQ2670933FDOQ2670933
Authors: Ndiamé Ndiaye, Serguei Norine, Adrian Vetta
Publication date: 1 June 2022
Abstract: The set of stable matchings induces a distributive lattice. The supremum of the stable matching lattice is the boy-optimal (girl-pessimal) stable matching and the infimum is the girl-optimal (boy-pessimal) stable matching. The classical boy-proposal deferred-acceptance algorithm returns the supremum of the lattice, that is, the boy-optimal stable matching. In this paper, we study the smallest group of girls, called the {em minimum winning coalition of girls}, that can act strategically, but independently, to force the boy-proposal deferred-acceptance algorithm to output the girl-optimal stable matching. We characterize the minimum winning coalition in terms of stable matching rotations and show that its cardinality can take on any value between and , for instances with boys and girls. Our main result is that, for the random matching model, the expected cardinality of the minimum winning coalition is . This resolves a conjecture of Kupfer cite{Kup18}.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15748
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Rings of sets
- The Complexity of Counting Stable Marriages
- Three Fast Algorithms for Four Problems in Stable Marriage
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage
- Ms. Machiavelli and the Stable Matching Problem
- Machiavelli and the Gale-Shapley Algorithm
- The Economics of Matching: Stability and Incentives
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The Average Number of Stable Matchings
- Stable husbands
- On likely solutions of a stable marriage problem
- An analysis of the stable marriage assignment algorithm
This page was built for publication: Descending the stable matching lattice: how many strategic agents are required to turn pessimality to optimality?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2670933)