Descending the stable matching lattice: how many strategic agents are required to turn pessimality to optimality?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2670933
Abstract: The set of stable matchings induces a distributive lattice. The supremum of the stable matching lattice is the boy-optimal (girl-pessimal) stable matching and the infimum is the girl-optimal (boy-pessimal) stable matching. The classical boy-proposal deferred-acceptance algorithm returns the supremum of the lattice, that is, the boy-optimal stable matching. In this paper, we study the smallest group of girls, called the {em minimum winning coalition of girls}, that can act strategically, but independently, to force the boy-proposal deferred-acceptance algorithm to output the girl-optimal stable matching. We characterize the minimum winning coalition in terms of stable matching rotations and show that its cardinality can take on any value between and , for instances with boys and girls. Our main result is that, for the random matching model, the expected cardinality of the minimum winning coalition is . This resolves a conjecture of Kupfer cite{Kup18}.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 16479 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 45086 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3558960 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1033382 (Why is no real title available?)
- An analysis of the stable marriage assignment algorithm
- College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage
- Machiavelli and the Gale-Shapley Algorithm
- Ms. Machiavelli and the Stable Matching Problem
- On likely solutions of a stable marriage problem
- Rings of sets
- Stable husbands
- The Average Number of Stable Matchings
- The Complexity of Counting Stable Marriages
- The Economics of Matching: Stability and Incentives
- Three Fast Algorithms for Four Problems in Stable Marriage
This page was built for publication: Descending the stable matching lattice: how many strategic agents are required to turn pessimality to optimality?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2670933)