Metric-distortion bounds under limited information
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2670934
Abstract: In this work we study the metric distortion problem in voting theory under a limited amount of ordinal information. Our primary contribution is threefold. First, we consider mechanisms which perform a sequence of pairwise comparisons between candidates. We show that a widely-popular deterministic mechanism employed in most knockout phases yields distortion while eliciting only out of possible pairwise comparisons, where represents the number of candidates. Our analysis for this mechanism leverages a powerful technical lemma recently developed by Kempe cite{DBLP:conf/aaai/000120a}. We also provide a matching lower bound on its distortion. In contrast, we prove that any mechanism which performs fewer than pairwise comparisons is destined to have unbounded distortion. Moreover, we study the power of deterministic mechanisms under incomplete rankings. Most notably, when every agent provides her -top preferences we show an upper bound of on the distortion, for any . Thus, we substantially improve over the previous bound of recently established by Kempe cite{DBLP:conf/aaai/000120a,DBLP:conf/aaai/000120b}, and we come closer to matching the best-known lower bound. Finally, we are concerned with the sample complexity required to ensure near-optimal distortion with high probability. Our main contribution is to show that a random sample of voters suffices to guarantee distortion with high probability, for any sufficiently small . This result is based on analyzing the sensitivity of the deterministic mechanism introduced by Gkatzelis, Halpern, and Shah cite{DBLP:conf/focs/Gkatzelis0020}. Importantly, all of our sample-complexity bounds are distribution-independent.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Approximating optimal social choice under metric preferences
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3106184 (Why is no real title available?)
- Lower bounds for sampling algorithms for estimating the average
- Optimal social choice functions: a utilitarian view
- Ordinal approximation for social choice, matching, and facility location problems given candidate positions
- Peeking behind the ordinal curtain: improving distortion via cardinal queries
- Randomized social choice functions under metric preferences
- Social welfare in one-sided matchings: random priority and beyond
- Subset selection via implicit utilitarian voting
- The Copeland method. I: Relationships and the dictionary
- The distortion of distributed voting
- Truthful facility assignment with resource augmentation: an exact analysis of serial dictatorship
Cited in
(7)- Peeking behind the ordinal curtain: improving distortion via cardinal queries
- Metric-Distortion Bounds under Limited Information
- The distortion of distributed metric social choice
- The distortion of distributed metric social choice
- Tight distortion bounds for distributed metric voting on a line
- Approximating optimal social choice under metric preferences
- Awareness of voter passion greatly improves the distortion of metric social choice
This page was built for publication: Metric-distortion bounds under limited information
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2670934)