Objective comparison of quantitative imaging modalities without the use of a gold standard

DOI10.1007/3-540-45729-1_2MaRDI QIDQ2779909zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors John Hoppin, Matthew Kupinski, George Kastis, Eric W. Clarkson, Harrison H. Barrett

Publication date 15 April 2002

Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45729-1_2

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Biomedical imaging and signal processing (92C55) Computing methodologies for image processing (68U10)

Recommendations

• Evaluating Agreement with a Gold Standard in Method Comparison Studies
• On Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy From Studies With Multiple Raters and Partial Gold Standard Evaluation
• Estimating confidence intervals for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories without a gold standard
• Comparing Two Diagnostic Tests against the Same "Gold Standard" in the Same Sample
• Imputation Approaches for Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy for Multiple Tests from Partially Verified Designs

This page was built for publication: Objective comparison of quantitative imaging modalities without the use of a gold standard

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2779909)