The cross-cut statistic and its sensitivity to bias in observational studies with ordered doses of treatment

DOI10.1111/biom.12373zbMath1393.62095OpenAlexW1844718320WikidataQ40619911 ScholiaQ40619911MaRDI QIDQ2805193

Paul R. Rosenbaum

Publication date: 10 May 2016

Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12373

zbMATH Keywords

sensitivity analysisobservational studiescontingency tabledesign sensitivitypower of a sensitivity analysisdoses of treatment

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Medical applications (general) (92C50)

Related Items (3)

An adaptive Mantel–Haenszel test for sensitivity analysis in observational studies ⋮ The general structure of evidence factors in observational studies ⋮ Dimensions, power and factors in an observational study of behavioral problems after physical abuse of children

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• The sensitivity of linear regression coefficients' confidence limits to the omission of a confounder
• On nonparametric measures of dependence for random variables
• Generalized association, with applications in multivariate statistics
• An exact adaptive test with superior design sensitivity in an observational study of treatments for ovarian cancer
• Amplification of Sensitivity Analysis in Matched Observational Studies
• Quantiles in Nonrandom Samples and Observational Studies
• On Estimation of the Survivor Average Causal Effect in Observational Studies When Important Confounders Are Missing Due to Death
• Split Samples and Design Sensitivity in Observational Studies
• Case Definition and Design Sensitivity
• Calibrating Sensitivity Analyses to Observed Covariates in Observational Studies
• Design sensitivity in observational studies
• Sensitivity analysis for trend tests: application to the risk of radiation exposure
• A Corner Test for Association

This page was built for publication: The cross-cut statistic and its sensitivity to bias in observational studies with ordered doses of treatment