Split Samples and Design Sensitivity in Observational Studies

DOI10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08338zbMath1388.62231OpenAlexW2008683465MaRDI QIDQ5254729

Ruth Heller, Dylan S. Small, Paul R. Rosenbaum

Publication date: 10 June 2015

Published in: Journal of the American Statistical Association (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1089&context=statistics_papers

zbMATH Keywords

sensitivitycoherencemultiple comparisonspermutation test

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistical block designs (62K10)

Related Items (14)

Does data splitting improve prediction? ⋮ Sharpening the Rosenbaum Sensitivity Bounds to Address Concerns About Interactions Between Observed and Unobserved Covariates ⋮ An exact adaptive test with superior design sensitivity in an observational study of treatments for ovarian cancer ⋮ Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward ⋮ Rejoinder: Matching methods for observational studies derived from large administrative databases ⋮ Case Definition and Design Sensitivity ⋮ Effect Modification and Design Sensitivity in Observational Studies ⋮ The cross-cut statistic and its sensitivity to bias in observational studies with ordered doses of treatment ⋮ Weighted M-statistics With Superior Design Sensitivity in Matched Observational Studies With Multiple Controls ⋮ On Sensitivity Value of Pair-Matched Observational Studies ⋮ A New u-Statistic with Superior Design Sensitivity in Matched Observational Studies ⋮ Multiple Testing When Many p-Values are Uniformly Conservative, with Application to Testing Qualitative Interaction in Educational Interventions ⋮ Selecting and Ranking Individualized Treatment Rules With Unmeasured Confounding ⋮ Nonparametric bounds and sensitivity analysis of treatment effects

This page was built for publication: Split Samples and Design Sensitivity in Observational Studies