Irreconcilability of P-value and Bayesian measure in two-sided hypothesis: Pareto distribution with the presence of nuisance parameter
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2811448
Recommendations
- The discrepancy of \(P\)-values and posterior probability: two-sided hypothesis of variance of normal distribution with unknown mean
- Testing normal means: the reconcilability of the \(P\) value and the Bayesian evidence
- Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
- The discrepancy of \(P\)-values and posterior probability in Poisson distribution
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2058055
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3189754 (Why is no real title available?)
- A STATISTICAL PARADOX
- A SUITABLE BAYESIAN APPROACH IN TESTING POINT NULL HYPOTHESIS: SOME EXAMPLES REVISITED
- A note on Lindley's paradox
- Comparison of testing procedures utilizingP-values and Bayes factors in some common situations
- Generalized \(P\)-values and Bayesian evidence in the one-sided testing problems under exponential distributions
- Testing precise hypotheses. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
Cited in
(5)- The discrepancy of \(P\)-values and posterior probability: two-sided hypothesis of variance of normal distribution with unknown mean
- Modification of the \(P\)-value of a two-sided test with restricted parameter space and its reconciliation with Bayesian evidence
- The numerical reconcilability of Bayesian measure and p-value in interval hypotheses is not possible in general
- Testing normal means: the reconcilability of the \(P\) value and the Bayesian evidence
- P Values Maximized Over a Confidence Set for the Nuisance Parameter
This page was built for publication: Irreconcilability of \(P\)-value and Bayesian measure in two-sided hypothesis: Pareto distribution with the presence of nuisance parameter
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2811448)