Bell could become the Copernicus of probability
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2816979
Abstract: Our aim is to emphasize the role of mathematical models in physics, especially models of geometry and probability. We briefly compare developments of geometry and probability by pointing to similarities and differences: from Euclid to Lobachevsky and from Kolmogorov to Bell. In probability Bell played the same role as Lobachevsky in geometry. In fact, violation of Bell's inequality implies the impossibility to apply the classical probability model of Kolmogorov (1933) to quantum phenomena. Thus quantum probabilistic model (based on Born's rule) is an example of non-Kolmogorovian model of probability, similarly to the Lobachevskian model -- the first example of non-Euclidean model of geometry. We also discuss coupling of the classical probabilistic model with classical (Boolean) logic. The Kolmogorov model of probability is based on the set-theoretic presentation of the Boolean logic. In this framework violation of Bell's inequality implies the impossibility to use the Boolean structure of events for quantum phenomena; instead of it, events have to be represented by linear subspaces. This is the "probability model" interpretation of violation of Bell's inequality. We also criticize the standard interpretation -- an attempt to add to rigorous mathematical probability models additional elements such as (non)locality and (un)realism. Finally, we compare embeddings of non-Euclidean geometries into the Euclidean space with embeddings of the non-Kolmogorovian probabilities (in particular, quantum probability) into the Kolmogorov probability space. As an example, we consider the CHSH-test.
Recommendations
- Non-Kolmogorov probability models and modified Bell's inequality
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5873100
- Nonlocality as well as rejection of realism are only sufficient (but non-necessary!) conditions for violation of Bell's inequality
- Violation of Bell's inequality and non-Kolmogorovness
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4072005
Cites work
- A perturbation of CHSH inequality induced by fluctuations of ensemble distributions
- Bell inequalities, experimental protocols and contextuality
- Bell-Boole inequality: nonlocality or probabilistic incompatibility of random variables?
- Computer simulation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments
- EPR-Bohm experiment and Bell's inequality: Quantum physics meets probability theory
- Generalized Kolmogorov models for probabilistic quantum-type experiments
- Generalized probabilities taking values in non-Archimedean fields and in topological groups
- Kolmogorov Probability Spaces Describing Accardi Models of Quantum Correlations
- Linear representations of probabilistic transformations induced by context transitions
- No-forcing and no-matching theorems for classical probability applied to quantum mechanics
- Non-Kolmogorov probability models and modified Bell's inequality
- Nonclassical total probability formula and quantum interference of probabilities
- Nonlocality as well as rejection of realism are only sufficient (but non-necessary!) conditions for violation of Bell's inequality
- On relations between probabilities under quantum and classical measurements
- Photon flux and distance from the source: consequences for quantum communication
- Quantum probabilities and violation of CHSH-inequality from classical random signals and threshold type detection scheme
- Quantum-like representation algorithm for trichotomous observables
- Representation of the Kolmogorov model having all distinguishing features of quantum probabilistic model
- The logic of quantum mechanics
Cited in
(7)- Quantum versus classical entanglement: eliminating the issue of quantum nonlocality
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2242879 (Why is no real title available?)
- Non-Kolmogorov probability models and modified Bell's inequality
- The discrete center-of-mass tomogram
- Probabilistic frames for non-Boolean phenomena
- Application of non-Kolmogorovian probability and quantum adaptive dynamics to unconscious inference in visual perception process
- Computer simulation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiments
This page was built for publication: Bell could become the Copernicus of probability
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2816979)