Bell inequalities, experimental protocols and contextuality
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:497063)
Abstract: The violation of Bell, CHSH and CH inequalities indicates only that the assumption of "conterfactual definiteness" and/or the probabilistic models used in proofs were incorrect. In this paper we discuss in detail an intimate relation between experimental protocols and probabilistic models. In particular we show that local realistic and stochastic hidden variable models are inconsistent with the experimental protocols used in spin polarization correlation experiments. In particular these models neglect a contextual character of quantum theory (QT) and do not describe properly quantum measurements. We argue that the violation of various inequalities gives arguments against the irreducible randomness of act of the measurement. Therefore quantum probabilities are reducible what means that QT is emergent. In this case one could expect to discover in time series of data some unpredicted fine structures proving that QT is not predictably complete what would be a major discovery.
Recommendations
- Bell inequalities and quantum mechanics
- Bell inequalities and entanglement
- Bell inequalities and the separability criterion
- Contextual Hidden Variables Theories and Bell's Inequalities
- Bell inequalities, counterfactual definiteness and falsifiability
- BELL'S INEQUALITY AND CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4072005
- Entanglement correlations, Bell inequalities and the concurrence
- Quantum mechanics and Bell’s inequalities
- Bell's inequality from the contextual probabilistic viewpoint
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5873087 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5873100 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5873120 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3167425 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5012832 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1233803 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1418766 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3209023 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3251317 (Why is no real title available?)
- Bell's inequalities and EPR-B experiments: are they disjoint?
- Bell's theorem and the problem of decidability between the views of Einstein and Bohr
- Bell's theorem: critique of proofs with and without inequalities
- Better Bell inequalities (passion at a distance)
- Contextual approach to quantum formalism
- Einstein Was Right!
- Epistemic and ontic quantum realities
- Fifty years of Bell's theorem
- Foundations of quantum mechanics, an empiricist approach
- Is the contextuality loophole fatal for the derivation of Bell inequalities?
- No time loophole in Bell's theorem: The Hess–Philipp model is nonlocal
- No-forcing and no-matching theorems for classical probability applied to quantum mechanics
- Non-realism: deep thought or a soft option?
- Nonlocality as well as rejection of realism are only sufficient (but non-necessary!) conditions for violation of Bell's inequality
- Operational approach to entanglement and how to certify it
- Quantum non-locality -- it ain't necessarily so\dots
- Selectivity in probabilistic causality: where psychology runs into quantum physics
- Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. With an introduction by Alain Aspect
- Statistics, causality and Bell's theorem
- Time series analysis. Forecasting and control
- Ubiquitous Quantum Structure
- Understanding quantum measurement from the solution of dynamical models
- Violation of Bell's inequality and non-Kolmogorovness
- Where Bell went wrong
Cited in
(12)- On classical systems and measurements in quantum mechanics
- Bell inequalities, counterfactual definiteness and falsifiability
- Bell inequalities for position measurements
- Bell could become the Copernicus of probability
- Bell's inequality from the contextual probabilistic viewpoint
- Is the contextuality loophole fatal for the derivation of Bell inequalities?
- Can we close the Bohr-Einstein quantum debate?
- Bivalued ‘click’–‘no-click’ probabilities for EPRB spin correlations
- Quantum mechanics and Bell’s inequalities
- A sub-ensemble theory of ideal quantum measurement processes
- The contextuality loophole is fatal for the derivation of Bell inequalities: Reply to a comment by I. Schmelzer
- No-forcing and no-matching theorems for classical probability applied to quantum mechanics
This page was built for publication: Bell inequalities, experimental protocols and contextuality
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q497063)
