The joint embedding property and maximal models

From MaRDI portal
Publication:283129

DOI10.1007/S00153-016-0480-0zbMATH Open1436.03190DBLPjournals/aml/BaldwinKS16arXiv1501.07316OpenAlexW1480068463WikidataQ59166139 ScholiaQ59166139MaRDI QIDQ283129FDOQ283129


Authors: John T. Baldwin, Martin Koerwien, Ioannis Souldatos Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 13 May 2016

Published in: Archive for Mathematical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We introduce the notion of a `pure` Abstract Elementary Class to block trivial counterexamples. We study classes of models of bipartite graphs and show: Main Theorem (cf. Theorem 3.5.2 and Corollary 3.5.6): If (lambdai:ilealpha<aleph1) is a strictly increasing sequence of characterizable cardinals (Definition 2.1) whose models satisfy JEP(<lambda0), there is an Lomega1,omega -sentence psi whose models form a pure AEC and (1) The models of psi satisfy JEP(<lambda0), while JEP fails for all larger cardinals and AP fails in all infinite cardinals. (2) There exist 2lambdai+ non-isomorphic maximal models of psi in lambdai+, for all ilealpha, but no maximal models in any other cardinality; and (3) psi has arbitrarily large models. In particular this shows the Hanf number for JEP and the Hanf number for maximality for pure AEC with Lowenheim number aleph0 are at least . We show that although AP(kappa) for each kappa implies the full amalgamation property, JEP(kappa) for each kappa does not imply the full joint embedding property. We show the main combinatorial device of this paper cannot be used to extend the main theorem to a complete sentence.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.07316




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (13)





This page was built for publication: The joint embedding property and maximal models

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q283129)