Uniqueness of limit models in classes with amalgamation

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2827950

DOI10.1002/MALQ.201500033zbMATH Open1367.03067arXiv1507.02118OpenAlexW2963976658MaRDI QIDQ2827950FDOQ2827950


Authors: Rami Grossberg, Monica VanDieren, Andrés Villaveces Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 24 October 2016

Published in: Mathematical Logic Quarterly (MLQ) (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We prove: Main Theorem: Let mathcalK be an abstract elementary class satisfying the joint embedding and the amalgamation properties with no maximal models of cardinality mu. Let mu be a cardinal above the the L"owenheim-Skolem number of the class. If mathcalK is mu-Galois-stable, has no mu-Vaughtian Pairs, does not have long splitting chains, and satisfies locality of splitting, then any two (mu,sigmaell)-limits over M, for ellin1,2, are isomorphic over M. This theorem extends results of Shelah from cite{Sh394}, cite{Sh576}, cite{Sh600}, Kolman and Shelah in cite{KoSh} and Shelah and Villaveces from cite{ShVi}. A preliminary version of our uniqueness theorem, which was circulated in 2006, was used by Grossberg and VanDieren to prove a case of Shelah's categoricity conjecture for tame abstract elementary classes in cite{GrVa2}. Preprints of this paper have also influenced the Ph.D. theses of Drueck cite{Dr} and Zambrano cite{Za}. This paper also serves the expository role of presenting together the arguments in cite{Va1} and cite{Va2} in a more natural context in which the amalgamation property holds and this work provides an approach to the uniqueness of limit models that does not rely on Ehrenfeucht-Mostowski constructions.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02118




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (31)





This page was built for publication: Uniqueness of limit models in classes with amalgamation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2827950)