Tameness from two successive good frames
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2303697
Abstract: We show, assuming a mild set-theoretic hypothesis, that if an abstract elementary class (AEC) has a superstable-like forking notion for models of cardinality and a superstable-like forking notion for models of cardinality , then orbital types over models of cardinality are determined by their restrictions to submodels of cardinality . By a superstable-like forking notion, we mean here a good frame, a central concept of Shelah's book on AECs. It is known that locality of orbital types together with the existence of a superstable-like notion for models of cardinality implies the existence of a superstable-like notion for models of cardinality , but here we prove the converse. An immediate consequence is that forking in can be described in terms of forking in .
Recommendations
Cites work
- A survey on tame abstract elementary classes
- A theorem on Barr-exact categories, with an infinitary generalization
- Building independence relations in abstract elementary classes
- Categoricity
- Categoricity for abstract classes with amalgamation
- CATEGORICITY FROM ONE SUCCESSOR CARDINAL IN TAME ABSTRACT ELEMENTARY CLASSES
- Categoricity over P for first order T or categoricity for \(\phi\) \(\in {\mathcal L}_{\omega_ 1\omega}\) can stop at \(\aleph_ k\) while holding for \(\aleph_ 0,\dots ,\aleph_{k-1}\)
- Classification theory for abstract elementary classes
- Classification theory for abstract elementary classes. Vol 2.
- Downward categoricity from a successor inside a good frame
- GALOIS-STABILITY FOR TAME ABSTRACT ELEMENTARY CLASSES
- Good frames in the Hart-Shelah example
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3882412 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4037830 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4041886 (Why is no real title available?)
- Infinitary stability theory
- Large cardinal axioms from tameness in AECs
- Non-forking frames in abstract elementary classes
- On the uniqueness property of forking in abstract elementary classes
- Saturation and solvability in abstract elementary classes with amalgamation
- Shelah's categoricity conjecture from a successor for tame abstract elementary classes
- Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes. I.
- Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes. II
- Superstability and symmetry
- Symmetry and the union of saturated models in superstable abstract elementary classes
- Symmetry in abstract elementary classes with amalgamation
- Tameness and extending frames
- Tameness and frames revisited
- Tameness from large cardinal axioms
- Tameness, uniqueness triples and amalgamation
- The categoricity spectrum of large abstract elementary classes
- Uniqueness of limit models in classes with amalgamation
- When a first order T has limit models
Cited in
(9)- Non-forking w-good frames
- The categoricity spectrum of large abstract elementary classes
- Abstract elementary classes stable in \(\aleph_{0}\)
- Forking and superstability in tame AECs
- ON CATEGORICITY IN SUCCESSIVE CARDINALS
- Tameness and extending frames
- Forking in short and tame abstract elementary classes
- Tameness and frames revisited
- Tameness, uniqueness triples and amalgamation
This page was built for publication: Tameness from two successive good frames
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2303697)