Tameness and extending frames

DOI10.1142/S021906131450007XMaRDI QIDQ5176253zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Will Boney

Publication date 3 March 2015

Published in Journal of Mathematical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.6006

zbMATH Keywords

AECsgood \(\lambda\)-framesindependencetameness

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Classification theory, stability, and related concepts in model theory (03C45) Abstract elementary classes and related topics (03C48)

Abstract: We combine two notions in AECs, tameness and good $lambda$-frames, and show that they together give a very well-behaved nonforking notion in all cardinalities. This helps to fill a longstanding gap in classification theory of tame AECs and increases the applicability of frames. Along the way, we prove a complete stability transfer theorem and uniqueness of limit models in these AECs.

Recommendations

• Forking and superstability in tame AECs
• Tameness from two successive good frames
• Tameness and frames revisited
• Tameness, uniqueness triples and amalgamation
• Non-forking w-good frames

Cites work

• Categoricity for abstract classes with amalgamation
• CATEGORICITY FROM ONE SUCCESSOR CARDINAL IN TAME ABSTRACT ELEMENTARY CLASSES
• Categoricity in abstract elementary classes with no maximal models
• Categoricity of an abstract elementary class in two successive cardinals
• Categoricity of theories in \(L_{\kappa \omega}\), with \(\kappa\) a compact cardinal
• Categoricity over P for first order T or categoricity for \(\phi\) \(\in {\mathcal L}_{\omega_ 1\omega}\) can stop at \(\aleph_ k\) while holding for \(\aleph_ 0,\dots ,\aleph_{k-1}\)
• Categoricity, amalgamation, and tameness
• Erratum to: ``Categoricity in abstract elementary classes with no maximal models
• Examples of non-locality
• GALOIS-STABILITY FOR TAME ABSTRACT ELEMENTARY CLASSES
• Independence, dimension and continuity in non-forking frames
• Non-forking frames in abstract elementary classes
• Rank functions and partial stability spectra for tame abstract elementary classes
• Shelah's categoricity conjecture from a successor for tame abstract elementary classes
• Toward categoricity for classes with no maximal models
• Upward categoricity from a successor cardinal for tame abstract classes with amalgamation
• Upward stability transfer for tame abstract elementary classes

Cited in

(25)

• Good frames in the Hart-Shelah example
• Superstability, Noetherian rings and pure-semisimple rings
• Non-forking w-good frames
• Tameness from two successive good frames
• Algebraic description of limit models in classes of abelian groups
• Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes. I.
• The Hart-Shelah example, in stronger logics
• Canonical forking in AECs
• Forking and superstability in tame AECs
• Building independence relations in abstract elementary classes
• Toward a stability theory of tame abstract elementary classes
• EQUIVALENT DEFINITIONS OF SUPERSTABILITY IN TAME ABSTRACT ELEMENTARY CLASSES
• UNIVERSAL CLASSES NEAR ${\aleph _1}$
• On superstability in the class of flat modules and perfect rings
• ON CATEGORICITY IN SUCCESSIVE CARDINALS
• Building prime models in fully good abstract elementary classes
• Independence in model theory
• Chains of saturated models in AECs
• Symmetry in abstract elementary classes with amalgamation
• Forking in short and tame abstract elementary classes
• Tameness and frames revisited
• STABILITY RESULTS ASSUMING TAMENESS, MONSTER MODEL, AND CONTINUITY OF NONSPLITTING
• Limit models in strictly stable abstract elementary classes
• Downward categoricity from a successor inside a good frame
• Tameness, uniqueness triples and amalgamation

This page was built for publication: Tameness and extending frames

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5176253)