The complexity of equilibria for risk-modeling valuations

From MaRDI portal
Publication:284585

DOI10.1016/J.TCS.2016.04.013zbMATH Open1339.91005arXiv1510.08980OpenAlexW2963496271MaRDI QIDQ284585FDOQ284585

Burkhard Monien, Marios Mavronicolas

Publication date: 18 May 2016

Published in: Theoretical Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We study the complexity of deciding the existence of mixed equilibria for minimization games where players use valuations other than expectation to evaluate their costs. We consider risk-averse players seeking to minimize the sum mathsfV=mathsfE+mathsfR of expectation mathsfE and a risk valuation mathsfR of their costs; mathsfR is non-negative and vanishes exactly when the cost incurred to a player is constant over all choices of strategies by the other players. In a mathsfV-equilibrium, no player could unilaterally reduce her cost. Say that mathsfV has the Weak-Equilibrium-for-Expectation property if all strategies supported in a player's best-response mixed strategy incur the same conditional expectation of her cost. We introduce mathsfE-strict concavity and observe that every mathsfE-strictly concave valuation has the Weak-Equilibrium-for-Expectation property. We focus on a broad class of valuations shown to have the Weak-Equilibrium-for-Expectation property, which we exploit to prove two main complexity results, the first of their kind, for the two simplest cases of the problem: games with two strategies, or games with two players. For each case, we show that deciding the existence of a mathsfV-equilibrium is strongly mathcalNP-hard for certain choices of significant valuations (including variance and standard deviation).


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.08980




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (8)





This page was built for publication: The complexity of equilibria for risk-modeling valuations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q284585)