Asymptotic Comparison Between Constant-stress Testing and Step-stress Testing for Type-I Censored Data from Exponential Distribution

DOI10.1080/03610926.2013.790451zbMath1462.62152MaRDI QIDQ2876215

No author found.

Publication date: 18 August 2014

Published in: Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2013.790451

zbMATH Keywords

maximum likelihood estimation; Fisher information; accelerated life testing; optimal allocation; change-point; type-I censoring; cumulative exposure model; step-stress testing; constant-stress testing; optimal regression design

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

62F10: Point estimation

90B25: Reliability, availability, maintenance, inspection in operations research

62N05: Reliability and life testing

05B99: Designs and configurations

62F86: Parametric inference and fuzziness

62N86: Fuzziness, and survival analysis and censored data

Related Items

Analysis of simple step-stress accelerated life test data from Lindley distribution under type-I censoring, Parameter estimation of Lindley step stress model with independent competing risk under type 1 censoring, Geometry of an accelerated model with censored data, Geometry of the \(q\)-exponential distribution with dependent competing risks and accelerated life testing, Optimal designs for step-stress models under interval censoring

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Exact inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from exponential distribution under type-II censoring
• Optimal step-stress testing for progressively type-I censored data from exponential distribu\-tion
• Inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from the exponential distribution under time constraint
• Optimum simple step-stress accelerated life tests with censoring
• Optimum Simple Step-Stress Plans for Accelerated Life Testing
• Accelerated Life Testing - Step-Stress Models and Data Analyses
• Accelerated Testing
• Optimal sample size allocation for tests with multiple levels of stress with extreme value regression