Revisiting retesting in the estimation of proportions by group testing
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2965570
DOI10.1080/03610918.2014.960725zbMATH Open1361.62057OpenAlexW2006535535MaRDI QIDQ2965570FDOQ2965570
Authors: Graham Hepworth, Ray Watson 
Publication date: 3 March 2017
Published in: Communications in Statistics. Simulation and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2014.960725
Recommendations
- Estimation of proportions by group testing with retesting of positive groups
- Estimating proportions by group retesting with unequal group sizes at each stage
- A new estimator for a population proportion using group testing
- Robustness of Group Testing in the Estimation of Proportions
- Revisiting Nested Group Testing Procedures: New Results, Comparisons, and Robustness
- Improved estimation of proportions using inverse binomial group testing
- Estimating ordered binomial proportions with the use of group testing
- An Empirical Bayes Group-Testing Approach to Estimating Small Proportions
Point estimation (62F10) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Sequential estimation (62L12)
Cited In (7)
- Bias correction of estimated proportions using inverse binomial group testing
- Some limit results in estimation of proportion based on group testing
- Incorporating retesting outcomes for estimation of disease prevalence
- Proportional closeness estimation of probability of contamination under group testing
- Estimation of proportions by group testing with retesting of positive groups
- Estimating proportions by group retesting with unequal group sizes at each stage
- Random walk designs for selecting pool sizes in group testing estimation with small samples
This page was built for publication: Revisiting retesting in the estimation of proportions by group testing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2965570)
