From reasonable preferences, via argumentation, to logic

DOI10.1016/J.JAL.2016.08.001MaRDI QIDQ334156zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Justine Jacot, Frank Zenker, Emmanuel Genot

Publication date 31 October 2016

Published in Journal of Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2016.08.001

zbMATH Keywords

game theoryinferenceargumentationdialogical logicgame-theoretic semanticsbounded rational playerspragma-dialectics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic of natural languages (03B65) Other game-theoretic models (91A40) Games involving topology, set theory, or logic (91A44)

Recommendations

• Logical dialogues with explicit preference profiles and strategy selection
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7084933
• A rational account of classical logic argumentation for real-world agents
• Classical logic, argument and dialectic
• Towards a general framework for dialogues that accommodate reasoning about preferences

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3677798 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3779281 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3614533 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3274715 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2226181 (Why is no real title available?)
• From games to dialogues and back. Towards a general frame for validity
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

Cited in

(3)

• Logic, reasoning, argumentation: insights from the wild
• Logical dialogues with explicit preference profiles and strategy selection
• Von Wright's ``The logic of preference revisited

This page was built for publication: From reasonable preferences, via argumentation, to logic

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q334156)