From reasonable preferences, via argumentation, to logic

DOI10.1016/J.JAL.2016.08.001zbMATH Open1436.03171OpenAlexW2476682380MaRDI QIDQ334156FDOQ334156

Authors: Justine Jacot, Frank Zenker, Emmanuel Genot 

Publication date: 31 October 2016

Published in: Journal of Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2016.08.001

Recommendations

• Logical dialogues with explicit preference profiles and strategy selection
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7084933
• A rational account of classical logic argumentation for real-world agents
• Classical logic, argument and dialectic
• Towards a general framework for dialogues that accommodate reasoning about preferences

zbMATH Keywords

game theoryinferenceargumentationdialogical logicgame-theoretic semanticsbounded rational playerspragma-dialectics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic of natural languages (03B65) Other game-theoretic models (91A40) Games involving topology, set theory, or logic (91A44)

Cites Work

• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• From games to dialogues and back. Towards a general frame for validity
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (3)

• Logic, reasoning, argumentation: insights from the wild
• Logical dialogues with explicit preference profiles and strategy selection
• Von Wright's ``The logic of preference revisited

This page was built for publication: From reasonable preferences, via argumentation, to logic

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q334156)