Determining the best test for the 2×2 comparative trial

DOI10.1080/00949658908811206zbMath0726.62078MaRDI QIDQ3350515

Philip H. Ramsey

Publication date: 1989

Published in: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949658908811206

zbMATH Keywords

robustness; power; contingency tables; Type I error; chi square tests

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

62G10: Nonparametric hypothesis testing

62F03: Parametric hypothesis testing

62H17: Contingency tables

Cites Work

• In dispraise of the exact test: Do the marginal totals of the \(2\times 2\) table contain relevent information respecting the table proportions?
• A comparison of some conditional and unconditional exact tests for 2x2 contingency tables
• Test of Significance for 2 × 2 Contingency Tables
• A Modified Exact Test for 2 × 2 Contingency Tables
• Comparing two independent binomial proportions by a modified chi square test
• Actual Type 1 Error Probabilities for Various Tests in the Homogeneity Case of the 2×2 Contingency Table
• Improved likelihood ratio tests for complete contingency tables
• Raised conditional level of significance for the 2 × 2‐table when testing the equality of two probabilities
• Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Contrasts Among Multinomial Populations
• The Likelihood Test of Independence in Contingency Tables