Raised conditional level of significance for the 2 × 2‐table when testing the equality of two probabilities
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5580786
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9574.1970.tb00104.xzbMath0186.52101OpenAlexW1992844800WikidataQ57254906 ScholiaQ57254906MaRDI QIDQ5580786
Publication date: 1970
Published in: Statistica Neerlandica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1970.tb00104.x
Related Items (29)
A more powerful unconditional exact test of homogeneity for 2 × c contingency table analysis ⋮ Conditional and unconditional tests (and sample size) based on multiple comparisons for stratified \(2 \times 2\) tables ⋮ Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions ⋮ P-values based on approximate conditioning and \(p^{*}\) ⋮ ImprovedP-Values for Testing Marginal Homogeneity in 2 × 2 Contingency Tables ⋮ On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2×2 contingency table: an overview of fisher's exact test and yates' correction for continuity ⋮ Belief elicitation in experiments: Is there a hedging problem? ⋮ Exact-Corrected Confidence Interval for Risk Difference in Noninferiority Binomial Trials ⋮ Nearly exact sample size calculation for powerful non‐randomized tests for differences between binomial proportions ⋮ Comparison of tests for association of 2 × 2 tables under multiple testing setting ⋮ Contemporary frequentist views of the \(2\times 2\) binomial trial ⋮ Preferences and beliefs in a sequential social dilemma: a within-subjects analysis ⋮ Comparing the asymptotic power of exact tests in \(2\times 2\) tables ⋮ Unconditional exact tests for the difference of binomial probabilities-contrasted and compared ⋮ Testing general hypotheses under binomial sampling: the two sample case-asymptotic theory and exact procedures ⋮ Confidence intervals for two sample binomial distribution ⋮ Proving non-inferiority or equivalence of two treatments with dichotomous endpoints using exact methods ⋮ Practical valid inferences for the two-sample binomial problem ⋮ Exact tests based on pre-estimation and second order pivotals: non-inferiority trials ⋮ Determining the best test for the 2×2 comparative trial ⋮ Testing noninferiority in three‐armed clinical trials based on likelihood ratio statistics ⋮ Improvedp-Value Tests for Comparing Two Independent Binomial Proportions ⋮ On the Exact Size of Tests of Treatment Effects in Multi-Arm Clinical Trials ⋮ A Nonrandomized, Nonconservative Version of the Fisher Exact Test ⋮ An exhaustive numerical assessment of alternative unconditional tests of a binary treatment effect ⋮ A Cautionary Note on Exact Unconditional Inference for a Difference between Two Independent Binomial Proportions ⋮ A filter for ``confidence interval \(P\)-values ⋮ Exact Meta-Analysis Approach for Discrete Data and its Application to 2 × 2 Tables With Rare Events ⋮ Structural properties of UMPU-tests for \(2\times 2\) tables and some applications
Cites Work
This page was built for publication: Raised conditional level of significance for the 2 × 2‐table when testing the equality of two probabilities
