Raised conditional level of significance for the 2 × 2‐table when testing the equality of two probabilities
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5580786
DOI10.1111/J.1467-9574.1970.TB00104.XzbMATH Open0186.52101OpenAlexW1992844800WikidataQ57254906 ScholiaQ57254906MaRDI QIDQ5580786FDOQ5580786
Authors: R. D. Boschloo
Publication date: 1970
Published in: Statistica Neerlandica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.1970.tb00104.x
Cites Work
Cited In (33)
- Comparing the asymptotic power of exact tests in \(2\times 2\) tables
- Unconditional exact tests for the difference of binomial probabilities-contrasted and compared
- Testing general hypotheses under binomial sampling: the two sample case-asymptotic theory and exact procedures
- A cautionary note on exact unconditional inference for a difference between two independent binomial proportions
- Exact-Corrected Confidence Interval for Risk Difference in Noninferiority Binomial Trials
- A Nonrandomized, Nonconservative Version of the Fisher Exact Test
- Structural properties of UMPU-tests for \(2\times 2\) tables and some applications
- Confidence intervals for two sample binomial distribution
- Nearly exact sample size calculation for powerful non‐randomized tests for differences between binomial proportions
- On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2×2 contingency table: an overview of fisher's exact test and yates' correction for continuity
- Improvedp-Value Tests for Comparing Two Independent Binomial Proportions
- Comparison of tests for association of 2 × 2 tables under multiple testing setting
- Exact partially conditional binomial analysis for multinomial data in \(2 \times 2\) tables
- Conditional and unconditional tests (and sample size) based on multiple comparisons for stratified \(2 \times 2\) tables
- Belief elicitation in experiments: Is there a hedging problem?
- Design of randomized clinical trials with a binary endpoint: conditional versus unconditional analyses of a two-by-two table
- Are the tests overpowered or underpowered? A unified solution to correctly specify type I errors in design of clinical trials for two sample proportions
- On the exact size of tests of treatment effects in multi-arm clinical trials
- A filter for ``confidence interval \(P\)-values
- A more powerful unconditional exact test of homogeneity for 2 × c contingency table analysis
- An exhaustive numerical assessment of alternative unconditional tests of a binary treatment effect
- Determining the best test for the 2×2 comparative trial
- Noninferiority testing with censoring when the event rate is low
- Practical valid inferences for the two-sample binomial problem
- ImprovedP-Values for Testing Marginal Homogeneity in 2 × 2 Contingency Tables
- Exact tests based on pre-estimation and second order pivotals: non-inferiority trials
- Preferences and beliefs in a sequential social dilemma: a within-subjects analysis
- Proving non-inferiority or equivalence of two treatments with dichotomous endpoints using exact methods
- P-values based on approximate conditioning and \(p^{*}\)
- Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions
- Exact Meta-Analysis Approach for Discrete Data and its Application to 2 × 2 Tables With Rare Events
- Contemporary frequentist views of the \(2\times 2\) binomial trial
- Testing noninferiority in three‐armed clinical trials based on likelihood ratio statistics
This page was built for publication: Raised conditional level of significance for the 2 × 2‐table when testing the equality of two probabilities
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5580786)