Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1361509
DOI10.1016/0167-9473(94)90148-1zbMath0937.62534OpenAlexW1980208775MaRDI QIDQ1361509
A. Martín Andrés, A. Silva Mato
Publication date: 25 August 1997
Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(94)90148-1
Related Items
Asymptotic two-tailed confidence intervals for the difference of proportions, Conditional and unconditional tests (and sample size) based on multiple comparisons for stratified \(2 \times 2\) tables, Optimal Method for Realizing Two-Sided Inferences About a Linear Combination of Two Proportions, On construction of the smallest one-sided confidence interval for the difference of two proportions, Optimal correction for continuity and conditions for validity in the unconditional chi-squared test, One-tailed asymptotic inferences for the relative risk: A comparison of 63 inference methods, On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2×2 contingency table: an overview of fisher's exact test and yates' correction for continuity, Two-tailed approximate confidence intervals for the ratio of proportions, Two-tailed asymptotic inferences for the odds ratio in prospective and retrospective studies: evaluation of methods of inference, New asymptotic inferences about the difference, ratio, and linear combination of two independent proportions, Two-tailed asymptotic inferences for a proportion, One-sided asymptotic inferences for a proportion, Is Fisher's exact test very conservative?, Exact unconditional non-classical tests on the difference of two proportions, Comparing the asymptotic power of exact tests in \(2\times 2\) tables, Unconditional exact tests for the difference of binomial probabilities-contrasted and compared, Testing general hypotheses under binomial sampling: the two sample case-asymptotic theory and exact procedures, Maximum Average-Power (MAP) Tests, Proving non-inferiority or equivalence of two treatments with dichotomous endpoints using exact methods, Practical valid inferences for the two-sample binomial problem, Unconditional Versions of Several Tests Commonly Used in the Analysis of Contingency Tables, A numerical comparison of several unconditional exact tests in problems of equivalence based on the difference of proportions, Improvedp-Value Tests for Comparing Two Independent Binomial Proportions, A Cautionary Note on Exact Unconditional Inference for a Difference between Two Independent Binomial Proportions, Comment on ‘An improved score interval with a modified midpoint for a binomial proportion’, A filter for ``confidence interval \(P\)-values, On determining the \(P\)-value in \(2\times 2\) multinomial trials, Optimal unconditional test in \(2\times 2\) multinomial trials
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Exact Unconditional Sample Sizes for the 2 × 2 Binomial Trial
- A comparison of some conditional and unconditional exact tests for 2x2 contingency tables
- A New Probability Model for Determining Exact P-Values for 2 x 2 Contingency Tables When Comparing Binomial Proportions
- Test of Significance for 2 × 2 Contingency Tables
- Comparing two independent binomial proportions by a modified chi square test
- A review of classic non-asymptotic methods for comparing two proportions by means of independent sampLES
- A critical review of asymptotic methods for comparing two proportions by means of independent samples
- A Nonrandomized Unconditional Test for Comparing Two Proportions in 2×2 Contigency Tables
- Raised conditional level of significance for the 2 × 2‐table when testing the equality of two probabilities
- THE MEANING OF A SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL
- EXTENSION OF THE NEYMAN-PEARSON THEORY OF TESTS TO DISCONTINUOUS VARIATES
- A New Test for 2 × 2 Tables
