Comparison of Condorcet and Weber solutions on a plane: social choice versus centralization

DOI10.1016/J.COR.2013.12.007zbMATH Open1348.91107OpenAlexW2062897229MaRDI QIDQ337680FDOQ337680

Rongbing Huang, Mozart B. C. Menezes

Publication date: 10 November 2016

Published in: Computers \& Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2013.12.007

Recommendations

• The wisdom of voters: evaluating the Weber objective in the plane at the Condorcet solution
• Outcomes of voting and planning in single facility location problems
• Distance weighted voting and a single facility location problem
• Comparison of \(\alpha\)-Condorcet points with median and center locations
• How bad can a voting locating be

zbMATH Keywords

locationvotingCondorcet

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14) Voting theory (91B12) Discrete location and assignment (90B80) Spatial models in economics (91B72)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Mathematics and Politics
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• On the point for which the sum of the distances to \(n\) given points is minimum
• The wisdom of voters: evaluating the Weber objective in the plane at the Condorcet solution
• Outcomes of voting and planning in single facility location problems
• How bad can a voting locating be
• New perspectives in competitive location theory
• A note on accelerating the weiszfeld procedure

Cited In (3)

• Democratic elections and centralized decisions: Condorcet and approval voting compared with median and coverage locations
• The wisdom of voters: evaluating the Weber objective in the plane at the Condorcet solution
• How bad can a voting locating be

This page was built for publication: Comparison of Condorcet and Weber solutions on a plane: social choice versus centralization

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q337680)