Geometry of the faithfulness assumption in causal inference

From MaRDI portal
Publication:355081

DOI10.1214/12-AOS1080zbMATH Open1267.62068arXiv1207.0547OpenAlexW2092059090WikidataQ130494052 ScholiaQ130494052MaRDI QIDQ355081FDOQ355081


Authors: Caroline Uhler, Garvesh Raskutti, Bin Yu, Peter Bühlmann Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 24 July 2013

Published in: The Annals of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Many algorithms for inferring causality rely heavily on the faithfulness assumption. The main justification for imposing this assumption is that the set of unfaithful distributions has Lebesgue measure zero, since it can be seen as a collection of hypersurfaces in a hypercube. However, due to sampling error the faithfulness condition alone is not sufficient for statistical estimation, and strong-faithfulness has been proposed and assumed to achieve uniform or high-dimensional consistency. In contrast to the plain faithfulness assumption, the set of distributions that is not strong-faithful has nonzero Lebesgue measure and in fact, can be surprisingly large as we show in this paper. We study the strong-faithfulness condition from a geometric and combinatorial point of view and give upper and lower bounds on the Lebesgue measure of strong-faithful distributions for various classes of directed acyclic graphs. Our results imply fundamental limitations for the PC-algorithm and potentially also for other algorithms based on partial correlation testing in the Gaussian case.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0547




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (37)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Geometry of the faithfulness assumption in causal inference

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q355081)