Anomalies in the analysis of calibrated data
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3636728
Abstract: This study examines effects of calibration errors on model assumptions and data--analytic tools in direct calibration assays. These effects encompass induced dependencies, inflated variances, and heteroscedasticity among the calibrated measurements, whose distributions arise as mixtures. These anomalies adversely affect conventional inferences, to include the inconsistency of sample means; the underestimation of measurement variance; and the distributions of sample means, sample variances, and Student's t as mixtures. Inferences in comparative experiments remain largely intact, although error mean squares continue to underestimate the measurement variances. These anomalies are masked in practice, as conventional diagnostics cannot discern irregularities induced through calibration. Case studies illustrate the principal issues.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3984308 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Theorem on Convex Sets with Applications
- A robustness property of the tests for serial correlation
- An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
- Distribution of the Circular Serial Correlation Coefficient for Residuals from a Fitted Fourier Series
- Distribution of the Ratio of the Mean Square Successive Difference to the Variance
- Equality of More Than Two Variances and of More Than Two Dispersion Matrices Against Certain Alternatives
- Ordering Ellipsoidal Measures: Scale and Peakedness Orderings
- Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests
- TESTING FOR SERIAL CORRELATION IN LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION. II
- The calibration problem and closeness
- Über monotone Matrixfunktionen
Cited in
(5)
This page was built for publication: Anomalies in the analysis of calibrated data
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3636728)