Should Scoring Rules be “Effective”?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3747424
DOI10.1287/MNSC.31.5.527zbMATH Open0608.60041OpenAlexW2123248504MaRDI QIDQ3747424FDOQ3747424
Authors: Robert Nau
Publication date: 1985
Published in: Management Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.5.527
Recommendations
Cited In (50)
- Contrasting probabilistic scoring rules
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- An axiomatic characterization of wagering mechanisms
- An incentive compatible scoring rule for ordinal judgments of expected utility maximizers
- Extensive scoring rules
- Weighted Scoring Rules and Convex Risk Measures
- The geometry of proper scoring rules
- Scoring, truthlikeness, and value
- Local proper scoring rules of order two
- Choosing a strictly proper scoring rule
- Risk measures with the CxLS property
- Tailored scoring rules for probabilities
- Coherent conditional previsions and proper scoring rules
- Decision analysis under ambiguity
- Order-sensitivity and equivariance of scoring functions
- Dominating countably many forecasts
- Forecast evaluation of quantiles, prediction intervals, and other set-valued functionals
- Probabilism, entropies and strictly proper scoring rules
- From Proper Scoring Rules to Max-Min Optimal Forecast Aggregation
- Forecaster's dilemma: extreme events and forecast evaluation
- Why scoring functions cannot assess tail properties
- Measuring and adjusting for overconfidence
- A characterization for the spherical scoring rule
- Scoring in context
- Quantile evaluation, sensitivity to bracketing, and sharing business payoffs
- Proper scoring rules with arbitrary value functions
- Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
- Theory and applications of proper scoring rules
- Additive scoring rules for discrete sample spaces
- Evaluating quantile assessments
- Comonotonic proper scoring rules to measure ambiguity and subjective beliefs
- Evaluating Probabilities: Asymmetric Scoring Rules
- Elicitability and identifiability of set-valued measures of systemic risk
- Higher-order asymptotics for scoring rules
- Properization: constructing proper scoring rules via Bayes acts
- Economic Darwinism: Who has the best probabilities?
- The characterisation of scoring functions
- The uniqueness of local proper scoring rules: the logarithmic family
- Comment on article by Dawid and Musio
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Evaluating probability forecasts
- Preposterior expected loss as a scoring rule for prior distributions
- The value of a probability forecast from portfolio theory
- Do basketball scoring patterns reflect illegal point shaving or optimal in-game adjustments?
- Measurability of functionals and of ideal point forecasts
- A construction principle for proper scoring rules
- Proper scoring rules for general decision models
- Forecasting with imprecise probabilities
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR DOMINATION RESULTS FOR PROPER SCORING RULES
This page was built for publication: Should Scoring Rules be “Effective”?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3747424)