Scoring, truthlikeness, and value

DOI10.1007/S11229-021-03162-ZzbMATH Open1529.60006OpenAlexW3159385720MaRDI QIDQ6147170FDOQ6147170

Authors: Igor Douven 

Publication date: 1 February 2024

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03162-z

Recommendations

• Scoring in context
• Should Scoring Rules be “Effective”?
• Contrasting probabilistic scoring rules
• Axiomatic characterization of the quadratic scoring rule

zbMATH Keywords

scoring rulesvalueforecaststruthlikeness

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05)

Cites Work

• Expected information as ecpected utility
• Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science
• Accuracy and Coherence: Prospects for an Alethic Epistemology of Partial Belief
• Verisimilitude: The Third Period
• Axiomatic characterization of the quadratic scoring rule
• Attitudes toward epistemic risk and the value of experiments
• Verisimilitude and belief revision. With a focus on the relevant element account
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• What accuracy could not be
• Scoring in context
• Information and Inaccuracy
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• An Overview of Applications of Proper Scoring Rules

This page was built for publication: Scoring, truthlikeness, and value

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6147170)