Is the conjunction fallacy tied to probabilistic confirmation?
DOI10.1007/S11229-009-9698-2zbMATH Open1235.03041OpenAlexW2091050779MaRDI QIDQ408352FDOQ408352
Authors: Jonah N. Schupbach 
Publication date: 5 April 2012
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/3755/1/onCFT_schupbach.pdf
File on IPFS (Hint: this is only the Hash - if you get a timeout, this file is not available on our server.)
Recommendations
- A unified account of the conjunction fallacy by coherence
- The conjunction fallacy: explanations of the linda problem by the theory of hints
- On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: new experimental evidence regarding Linda
- A case of confusing probability and confirmation
- The Bayesian logic of frequency-based conjunction fallacies
Probability and inductive logic (03B48) Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10) Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05)
Cites Work
Cited In (8)
- A unified account of the conjunction fallacy by coherence
- Understanding conjunction fallacies: an evidence theory model of reprensentativeness
- A case of confusing probability and confirmation
- Walter the banker: the conjunction fallacy reconsidered
- On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: new experimental evidence regarding Linda
- Quantum-like models cannot account for the conjunction fallacy
- Shogenji's measure of justification and the inverse conjunction fallacy
- Verbal and behavioral learning in a probability compounding task
This page was built for publication: Is the conjunction fallacy tied to probabilistic confirmation?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q408352)
