Stability, fragility, and Rota's conjecture

From MaRDI portal
Publication:414652

DOI10.1016/J.JCTB.2011.09.004zbMATH Open1241.05010arXiv1006.1418OpenAlexW2122667898MaRDI QIDQ414652FDOQ414652


Authors: Dillon Mayhew, Stefan H. M. van Zwam, Geoff Whittle Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 11 May 2012

Published in: Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series B (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Fix a matroid N. A matroid M is N-fragile if, for each element e of M, at least one of Me and M/e has no N-minor. The Bounded Canopy Conjecture is that all GF(q)-representable matroids M that have an N-minor and are N-fragile have branch width bounded by a constant depending only on q and N. A matroid N stabilizes a class of matroids over a field F if, for every matroid M in the class with an N-minor, every F-representation of N extends to at most one F-representation of M. We prove that, if Rota's conjecture is false for GF(q), then either the Bounded Canopy Conjecture is false for GF(q) or there is an infinite chain of GF(q)-representable matroids, each not stabilized by the previous, each of which can be extended to an excluded minor. Our result implies the previously known result that Rota's conjecture holds for GF(4), and that the classes of near-regular and sixth-roots-of-unity have a finite number of excluded minors. However, the bound that we obtain on the size of such excluded minors is considerably larger than that obtained in previous proofs. For GF(5) we show that Rota's Conjecture reduces to the Bounded Canopy Conjecture.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.1418




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (12)





This page was built for publication: Stability, fragility, and Rota's conjecture

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q414652)