Noise in the wire: the real impact of wire resistance for the Johnson(-like) noise based secure communicator
From MaRDI portal
Publication:414980
DOI10.1016/J.PHYSLETA.2010.03.021zbMATH Open1237.94069arXiv1002.0087OpenAlexW2046095519MaRDI QIDQ414980FDOQ414980
Publication date: 11 May 2012
Published in: Physics Letters. A (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: We re-evaluate the impact of wire resistance on the noise voltage and current in the Johnson-(like)-noise based secure communicator, correcting the result presented in [Physics Letters A 359 (2006) 737]. The analysis shown here is based on the fluctuation-dissipation and the linear response theorems. The results indicate that the impact of wire resistance in practical communicators is significantly lower than the previous estimation.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.0087
Recommendations
- Response to Scheuer-Yariv: ``A classical key-distribution system based on Johnson (like) noise-how secure?
- A classical key-distribution system based on Johnson (like) noise-how secure?
- Totally secure classical communication utilizing Johnson (-like) noise and Kirchhoff's law
- Johnson(-like)-noise-Kirchhoff-loop based secure classical communicator characteristics, for ranges of two to two thousand kilometers, via model-line
- Notes on recent approaches concerning the Kirchhoff-law-Johnson-noise-based secure key exchange
Cites Work
- Johnson(-like)-noise-Kirchhoff-loop based secure classical communicator characteristics, for ranges of two to two thousand kilometers, via model-line
- A new look at the classical key exchange system based on amplified Johnson noise
- A classical key-distribution system based on Johnson (like) noise-how secure?
- Response to Scheuer-Yariv: ``A classical key-distribution system based on Johnson (like) noise-how secure?
Cited In (1)
This page was built for publication: Noise in the wire: the real impact of wire resistance for the Johnson(-like) noise based secure communicator
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q414980)