On the dimensionality of spacetime
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4340967
Abstract: Some superstring theories have more than one effective low-energy limit, corresponding to classical spacetimes with different dimensionalities. We argue that all but the 3+1-dimensional one might correspond to ``dead worlds, devoid of observers, in which case all such ensemble theories would actually predict that we should find ourselves inhabiting a 3+1-dimensional spacetime. With more or less than one time-dimension, the partial differential equations of nature would lack the hyperbolicity property that enables observers to make predictions. In a space with more than three dimensions, there can be no traditional atoms and perhaps no stable structures. A space with less than three dimensions allows no gravitational force and may be too simple and barren to contain observers.
Recommendations
Cited in
(35)- Matrix Wheeler-DeWitt equation, quantum cosmological tunneling and three-dimensional space
- Uniqueness of solution of an inverse source problem for ultrahyperbolic equations
- Space-time is four-dimensional
- Differential realization of pseudo-Hermiticity: A quantum mechanical analog of Einstein’s field equation
- D‐instantons and effective couplings in intersecting D‐brane models
- Eisenhart lift of Koopman-von Neumann mechanics
- On the dimensionality of space–time
- A note on \(3+1\) dimensionality
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6529192 (Why is no real title available?)
- Is the Lorentz signature of the metric of spacetime electromagnetic in origin?
- Search optimization, funnel topography, and dynamical criticality on the string landscape
- Dimensionality of space of the early universe as a consequence of the second law of thermodynamics
- The problem of determining multiple coefficients in an ultrahyperbolic equation
- Stability of inverse problems for ultrahyperbolic equations
- Geometrical interpretation of electromagnetism in a 5-dimensional manifold
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1022230 (Why is no real title available?)
- Would two dimensions be world enough for spacetime?
- Multi-time wave functions versus multiple timelike dimensions
- Experiment to test whether we live in a four-dimensional physical space-time
- Is The theory of everything merely the ultimate ensemble theory?
- The three-dimensional complex space theory
- Why odd-space and odd-time dimensions in even-dimensional spaces?
- Localized propagating tachyons in extended relativity theories
- On a Ströbel-inspired \(k(t)\) FLRW ansatz in a class of metric \(F(R)\) models
- Conditional stability for a Cauchy problem for the ultrahyperbolic Schrödinger equation
- Why Nature has made a choice of one time and three space coordinates?
- Living systems are dynamically stable by computing themselves at the quantum level
- ON THE MEASURE OF SPACETIME AND GRAVITY
- Why \(3+1\) metric rather than \(4+0\) or \(2+2\)?
- Answers in search of a question: `proofs' of the tri-dimensionality of space
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 903281 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3859070 (Why is no real title available?)
- How many dimensions are there?
- Static extra dimension and acceleration of the universe
- On a type of spacetime
This page was built for publication: On the dimensionality of spacetime
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4340967)
