Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Number of True Null Hypotheses in Multiplicity Testing

DOI10.1081/BIP-120024202zbMATH Open1197.62095OpenAlexW2046875666WikidataQ47416509 ScholiaQ47416509MaRDI QIDQ4430342FDOQ4430342

Authors Huey-Miin Hsueh, James J. Chen, Ralph L. Kodell

Publication date 7 October 2003

Published in Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1081/bip-120024202

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Monte Carlo methods (65C05) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)

Recommendations

• Comparisons of estimators of the number of true null hypotheses and adaptive FDR procedures in multiplicity testing
• Estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiple hypothesis testing
• A clarifying comparison of methods for controlling the false discovery rate
• On estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses for false discovery rate controlling procedures in exploratory DNA microarray studies
• Estimation of False Discovery Rates in Multiple Testing: Application to Gene Microarray Data

Cites work

• A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
• A modified Benjamini-Hochberg multiple comparisons procedure for controlling the false discovery rate
• Familywise Robustness Criteria for Multiple-Comparison Procedures
• Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response

Cited in

(20)

• An evaluation of statistical methods for aggregate patterns of replication failure
• Comparisons of estimators of the number of true null hypotheses and adaptive FDR procedures in multiplicity testing
• Supporting informationa robust method for large-scale multiple hypotheses testing
• A Statistical Framework for Hypothesis Testing in Real Data Comparison Studies
• Exploring the Information in p‐Values for the Analysis and Planning of Multiple‐Test Experiments
• Sample Size Calculations Based on Ranking and Selection in Microarray Experiments
• False discovery rate envelopes
• Estimating the proportion of false null hypotheses among a large number of independently tested hypotheses
• A powerful truncated tail strength method for testing multiple null hypotheses in one dataset
• Incorporating the number of true null hypotheses to improve power in multiple testing: application to gene microarray data
• Estimating the number of equal components for two high-dimensional mean vectors
• Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses in multiple testing problems
• Two new estimators for the proportion of true null hypotheses in multiple test
• Multiple-Testing Strategy for Analyzing cDNA Array Data on Gene Expression
• Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses using the pattern of observed \(p\)-values
• A look at multiplicity through misclassification
• The beta-binomial distribution for estimating the number of false rejections in microarray gene expression studies
• Estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiple hypothesis testing
• Efficient estimation of the number of false positives in high-throughput screening
• Estimation of False Discovery Rates in Multiple Testing: Application to Gene Microarray Data

This page was built for publication: Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Number of True Null Hypotheses in Multiplicity Testing

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4430342)