Comparisons of estimators of the number of true null hypotheses and adaptive FDR procedures in multiplicity testing

DOI10.1080/00949650903260855zbMath1206.62133OpenAlexW2076024021MaRDI QIDQ3070634

Yi-Ting Hwang

Publication date: 3 February 2011

Published in: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949650903260855

zbMATH Keywords

sensitivitymultiple hypothesis testingfalse discovery ratenumber of true null hypotheses

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Related Items (3)

Estimating the number of equal components for two high-dimensional mean vectors ⋮ Estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiple hypothesis testing ⋮ False discovery rate envelopes

Cites Work

• On estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses for false discovery rate controlling procedures in exploratory DNA microarray studies
• Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis (With comments)
• Resampling-based false discovery rate controlling multiple test procedures for correlated test statistics.
• The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency.
• Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate
• Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Number of True Null Hypotheses in Multiplicity Testing
• A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
• Incorporating the number of true null hypotheses to improve power in multiple testing: application to gene microarray data

This page was built for publication: Comparisons of estimators of the number of true null hypotheses and adaptive FDR procedures in multiplicity testing