scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2019884
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4440580
Recommendations
- An epistemic approach to paraconsistency: a logic of evidence and truth
- Paraconsistent logic, evidence, and justification
- The evidence approach to paraconsistency versus the paraconsistent approach to evidence
- A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation
- Inferential semantics, paraconsistency, and preservation of evidence
- Consequence-inconsistency interrelation: in the framework of paraconsistent logics
- Conflict without contradiction: paraconsistency and axiomatizable conflict toleration hierarchies in Evidence Logic
- On formal aspects of the epistemic approach to paraconsistency
- Paraconsistent logic: consistency, contradiction and negation
- Relevance and paraconsistency—a new approach
Cited in
(9)- Two conceptions of weight of evidence in Peirce's \textit{Illustrations of the logic of science}
- Logic with equality: Partisan corroboration and shifted pairing
- An epistemic approach to paraconsistency: a logic of evidence and truth
- A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation
- The concept of negation
- Conflict without contradiction: paraconsistency and axiomatizable conflict toleration hierarchies in Evidence Logic
- Credal Calculi, Evidence, and Consistency
- A SIMPLE APPROACH TOWARDS RECAPTURING CONSISTENT THEORIES IN PARACONSISTENT SETTINGS
- Tolerating Inconsistencies: A Study of Logic of Moral Conflicts
This page was built for publication:
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4440580)
