Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson

DOI10.1093/BJPS/53.4.539MaRDI QIDQ4459684zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Luc Bovens, Branden Fitelson, Stephan Hartmann, Josh Snyder

Publication date 18 May 2004

Published in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/1071/1/S_Hartmann_Odd.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

decision-making under riskphilosophy of sciencedecision-making under uncertaintycorroborating testimonyindependent witnesses

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Probability and inductive logic (03B48) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Corroborating Testimony, Probability and Surprise
• Corroborating Testimony and Ignorance: A Reply to Bovens, Fitelson, Hartmann and Snyder
• Reconciling probability theory and coherentism
• The corroboration paradox
• Coherence and reliability: the case of overlapping testimonies

Cited in

(10)

• The impossibility of coherence
• Undesigned coincidences and coherence for an hypothesis
• Corroborating Testimony, Probability and Surprise
• Reliability conducive measures of coherence
• The corroboration paradox
• Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: Coherence and truth: recovering from the impossibility results
• Corroborating Testimony and Ignorance: A Reply to Bovens, Fitelson, Hartmann and Snyder
• Reconciling probability theory and coherentism
• Weak Bayesian coherentism
• Too good to be true: when overwhelming evidence fails to convince

This page was built for publication: Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4459684)