Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson

DOI10.1093/BJPS/53.4.539zbMATH Open1041.03018OpenAlexW2096042288MaRDI QIDQ4459684FDOQ4459684

Authors: Luc Bovens, Branden Fitelson, Stephan Hartmann, Josh Snyder 

Publication date: 18 May 2004

Published in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/1071/1/S_Hartmann_Odd.pdf

Recommendations

• Corroborating Testimony, Probability and Surprise
• Corroborating Testimony and Ignorance: A Reply to Bovens, Fitelson, Hartmann and Snyder
• Reconciling probability theory and coherentism
• The corroboration paradox
• Coherence and reliability: the case of overlapping testimonies

zbMATH Keywords

decision-making under riskphilosophy of sciencedecision-making under uncertaintycorroborating testimonyindependent witnesses

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Probability and inductive logic (03B48) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cited In (9)

• Weak Bayesian coherentism
• Too good to be true: when overwhelming evidence fails to convince
• Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: Coherence and truth: recovering from the impossibility results
• The impossibility of coherence
• Reliability conducive measures of coherence
• Reconciling probability theory and coherentism
• Corroborating Testimony, Probability and Surprise
• Corroborating Testimony and Ignorance: A Reply to Bovens, Fitelson, Hartmann and Snyder
• The corroboration paradox

This page was built for publication: Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4459684)