Reconciling probability theory and coherentism

DOI10.1007/S11229-013-0310-4MaRDI QIDQ484950zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Conal Duddy

Publication date 8 January 2015

Published in Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0310-4

zbMATH Keywords

Bayesiancoherenceprobability theorycoherentismtestimonywitness model

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10) Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05)

Recommendations

• Weak Bayesian coherentism
• Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson
• The impossibility of coherence
• Equivalent testimonies as a touchstone of coherence measures
• Coherence and reliability: the case of overlapping testimonies

Cites work

• Corroborating Testimony, Probability and Surprise
• Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson
• Weak Bayesian coherentism

Cited in

(13)

• Weak Bayesian coherentism
• The probabilistic analysis of testimony
• Too good to be true: when overwhelming evidence fails to convince
• Resonance. From probability to epistemology and back
• Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson
• Testimony, credibility, and explanatory coherence
• Coherent qualitative probability
• HOW SETS OF COHERENT PROBABILITIES MAY SERVE AS MODELS FOR DEGREES OF INCOHERENCE
• Corroborating Testimony, Probability and Surprise
• Undesigned coincidences and coherence for an hypothesis
• Towards a grammar of Bayesian coherentism
• Resolving the Cohenian paradox in judicial probability theory
• Corroborating Testimony and Ignorance: A Reply to Bovens, Fitelson, Hartmann and Snyder

This page was built for publication: Reconciling probability theory and coherentism

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q484950)