Ideal counterpart theorizing and the accuracy argument for probabilism

DOI10.1093/ANALYS/ANX107zbMATH Open1400.03009OpenAlexW2742304656MaRDI QIDQ4554971FDOQ4554971

Authors: Clinton Castro, Olav B. Vassend 

Publication date: 19 November 2018

Published in: Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx107

Recommendations

• Accuracy and Coherence: Prospects for an Alethic Epistemology of Partial Belief
• Accuracy, conditionalization, and probabilism
• Accuracy-First Epistemology Without Additivity
• Repugnant accuracy
• Arguments For—Or Against—Probabilism?

zbMATH Keywords

Bayesianismepistemologyaccuracyprobabilismideal agent theorizing

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Probability and inductive logic (03B48) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cited In (6)

• Why be (approximately) coherent?
• On the Best Accuracy Arguments for Probabilism
• An accuracy-dominance argument for conditionalization
• Repugnant accuracy
• Accuracy and epistemic conservatism
• A modesty proposal

This page was built for publication: Ideal counterpart theorizing and the accuracy argument for probabilism

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4554971)