The impact of learning by thought on violations of independence and coalescing
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4692003
DOI10.1287/DECA.2015.0316zbMATH Open1398.91144OpenAlexW2235568408MaRDI QIDQ4692003FDOQ4692003
Authors: Michael H. Birnbaum, Ulrich Schmidt 
Publication date: 24 October 2018
Published in: Decision Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/4159546e2558d6e84099df90d3726260f23617dc
Recommendations
- Does learning diminish violations of independence, coalescing and monotonicity?
- Learning in the Allais paradox
- Violations of the independence axiom in common ratio problems: An experimental test of some competing hypotheses
- Subjective probability weighting and the discovered preference hypothesis
- The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments
Cites Work
- Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
- An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory
- Learning in the Allais paradox
- Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for binary gambles
- Three New Tests of Independence That Differentiate Models of Risky Decision Making
- Does repetition improve consistency?
- Subjective probability weighting and the discovered preference hypothesis
- Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order gambles
- Testing descriptive utility theories: Violations of stochastic dominance and cumulative independence
- Causes of Allais common consequence paradoxes: an experimental dissection
- Reconsidering the common ratio effect: the roles of compound independence, reduction, and coalescing
- Testing New Theories of Choice under Uncertainty using the Common Consequence Effect
Cited In (3)
This page was built for publication: The impact of learning by thought on violations of independence and coalescing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4692003)
