Reconsidering the common ratio effect: the roles of compound independence, reduction, and coalescing

DOI10.1007/s11238-014-9456-xzbMath1304.91061MaRDI QIDQ490068

Christian Seidl, Ulrich Schmidt

Publication date: 21 January 2015

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/98412

zbMATH Keywords

reductionAllais paradoxbranch splittingcoalescingcommon ratio effectcompound independenceevent splittingisolation effect

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

91B06: Decision theory

91A90: Experimental studies

Related Items

The Impact of Learning by Thought on Violations of Independence and Coalescing, Violations of coalescing in parametric utility measurement, Indistinguishability of small probabilities, subproportionality, and the common ratio effect

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Do subjects separate (or are they sophisticated)?
• Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order gambles
• Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
• Some mixed results on boundary effects
• More mixed results on boundary effects
• On the validity of the random lottery incentive system
• The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments
• Causes of Allais common consequence paradoxes: an experimental dissection
• A note on deriving rank-dependent utility using additive joint receipts
• The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. (With commentaries)
• Two-Stage Lotteries without the Reduction Axiom
• Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
• Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data
• The Probability Weighting Function
• The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk
• Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine
• Are event-splitting effects actually boundary effects?