Do subjects separate (or are they sophisticated)?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:816760
DOI10.1007/S10683-005-1465-8zbMATH Open1137.91377OpenAlexW2064318775MaRDI QIDQ816760FDOQ816760
Publication date: 23 February 2006
Published in: Experimental Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-005-1465-8
strategiesrandom lottery incentive mechanismSelten's measure of predictive successseparation hypothesis
Cites Work
- Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data
- The Borda Rule and Pareto Stability: A Comment
- "Preference Reversal" and the Observability of Preferences by Experimental Methods
- Properties of a measure of predictive success
- On the validity of the random lottery incentive system
- The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments
- Dynamic decision-making under uncertainty: an experimental investigation of choices between accumulator gambles
- An application of Selten's measure of predictive success
Cited In (21)
- Does boundary distinguish complexities?
- The effect of the background risk in a simple chance improving decision model
- Ambiguous information and dilation: an experiment
- Does changing the subject from A to B really provide an enlarged understanding of A?
- Social motives and risk-taking in investment decisions
- Preface
- Does This Set of Clauses Overlap with at Least One MUS?
- Revenue implications of strategic and external auction risk
- The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity
- Individual and couple decision behavior under risk: evidence on the dynamics of power balance
- Afriat in the lab
- The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?
- Statistical inference for measures of predictive success
- Social motives vs. social influence: an experiment on interdependent time preferences
- Incentive contracts when agents distort probabilities
- Eliciting ambiguity aversion in unknown and in compound lotteries: a smooth ambiguity model experimental study
- Reconsidering the common ratio effect: the roles of compound independence, reduction, and coalescing
- Naive, resolute or sophisticated? A study of dynamic decision making
- Are event-splitting effects actually boundary effects?
- Noise and bias in eliciting preferences
- Subject Evaluation in Social Experiments
Recommendations
- On the validity of the random lottery incentive system 👍 👎
- The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments 👍 👎
- Randomize at Your Own Risk: On the Observability of Ambiguity Aversion 👍 👎
- Why do people prefer randomisation? An experimental investigation 👍 👎
- Eliciting subjective probability distributions with binary lotteries 👍 👎
This page was built for publication: Do subjects separate (or are they sophisticated)?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q816760)
