Do subjects separate (or are they sophisticated)?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:816760
DOI10.1007/s10683-005-1465-8zbMath1137.91377OpenAlexW2064318775MaRDI QIDQ816760
Publication date: 23 February 2006
Published in: Experimental Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-005-1465-8
strategiesrandom lottery incentive mechanismSelten's measure of predictive successseparation hypothesis
Related Items
Noise and bias in eliciting preferences, Revenue implications of strategic and external auction risk, Afriat in the lab, Social motives vs. social influence: an experiment on interdependent time preferences, Individual and couple decision behavior under risk: evidence on the dynamics of power balance, Ambiguous information and dilation: an experiment, Statistical inference for measures of predictive success, Reconsidering the common ratio effect: the roles of compound independence, reduction, and coalescing, Eliciting ambiguity aversion in unknown and in compound lotteries: a smooth ambiguity model experimental study, Social motives and risk-taking in investment decisions, The effect of the background risk in a simple chance improving decision model, The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity, Preface, Naive, resolute or sophisticated? A study of dynamic decision making, The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?
Cites Work
- Properties of a measure of predictive success
- On the validity of the random lottery incentive system
- An application of Selten's measure of predictive success
- The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments
- The Borda Rule and Pareto Stability: A Comment
- Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data
- "Preference Reversal" and the Observability of Preferences by Experimental Methods
- Dynamic decision-making under uncertainty: an experimental investigation of choices between accumulator gambles
