The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity
DOI10.1007/S11166-010-9102-0zbMATH Open1233.91073OpenAlexW2012997954MaRDI QIDQ707889FDOQ707889
Authors: John D. Hey, Gianna Lotito, Anna Maffioletti 
Publication date: 8 October 2010
Published in: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2318/138082
Recommendations
decision makinguncertaintyambiguityprospect theorydecision field theory(Ghirardato) alpha model(Gilboa and Schmeidler) maxmax EU(Gilboa and Schmeidler) maxmin EU(subjective) expected utilitybingo blowerchoquet expected utilitymaxinmaxmaxminimum regret
Cites Work
- Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses
- Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
- Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity
- The Theory of Statistical Decision
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
- Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance
- Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study
- Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment
- `Stochastically more risk averse': a contextual theory of stochastic discrete choice under risk
- Theory of capacities
- The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach
- Do subjects separate (or are they sophisticated)?
Cited In (20)
- On booms that never bust: ambiguity in experimental asset markets with bubbles
- Belief hedges: Measuring ambiguity for all events and all models
- Knowing me, imagining you: projection and overbidding in auctions
- DISPLAYING UNCERTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT PROBABILITY: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE
- Option implied ambiguity and its information content: evidence from the subprime crisis
- The Ellsberg paradox: a challenge to quantum decision theory?
- Decision making under uncertainty. Theory and application. With contributions from Christopher Amato, Girish Chowdhary, Jonathan P. How, Hayley J. Davison Reynolds, Jason R. Thornton, Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo, N. Kemal Üre and John Vian
- When and how to satisfice: an experimental investigation
- Fechner's strong utility model for choice among \(n > 2\) alternatives: risky lotteries, savage acts, and intertemporal payoffs
- Inferring beliefs as subjectively imprecise probabilities
- The price for information about probabilities and its relation with risk and ambiguity
- Individual antecedents of real options appraisal: the role of national culture and ambiguity
- Attitudes toward uncertainty and randomization: an experimental study
- Uncertainty and binary stochastic choice
- Eliciting ambiguity aversion in unknown and in compound lotteries: a smooth ambiguity model experimental study
- An experimental investigation of imprecision attitude and its relation with risk attitude and impatience
- Measuring and disentangling ambiguity and confidence in the lab
- Dynamic decision making under ambiguity: an experimental investigation
- The correct formula of 1979 prospect theory for multiple outcomes
- Black Swans, New Nostradamuses, Voodoo decision theories, and the science of decision making in the face of severe uncertainty
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q707889)
