The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:763344
DOI10.1007/s11238-010-9212-9zbMath1274.91146OpenAlexW3125531460MaRDI QIDQ763344
Ferdinand M. Vieider, Mathieu Lefebvre, Marie Claire Villeval
Publication date: 9 March 2012
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00435956/file/0925.pdf
Related Items (3)
If nudge cannot be applied: a litmus test of the readers' stance on paternalism ⋮ Good decision vs. good results: outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents ⋮ Comparing ambiguous urns with different sizes
Cites Work
- What is loss aversion?
- Do subjects separate (or are they sophisticated)?
- A parametric analysis of prospect theory's functionals for the general population
- Causes of ambiguity aversion: Known versus unknown preferences
- A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory
- Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
- An index of loss aversion
- The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. (With commentaries)
- On probabilities and loss aversion
- The effect of the background risk in a simple chance improving decision model
- Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
- Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
This page was built for publication: The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?