A comparison between minimum variance control and other online compensation methods for specimen drift in transmission electron microscopy

DOI10.1007/s11045-013-0246-3zbMath1305.93102OpenAlexW2128265599MaRDI QIDQ481838

Arturo Tejada, Arnold J. den Dekker

Publication date: 15 December 2014

Published in: Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11045-013-0246-3

zbMATH Keywords

hypothesis testingelectron microscopyminimum variance controlARMASAspecimen drift

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Application models in control theory (93C95) Adaptive control/observation systems (93C40)

Uses Software

• ARMASA

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?
• Minimum-variance control of linear time-varying systems
• Rational transfer function approximation. With comments and a reply by the author
• Introduction to stochastic control theory
• On self tuning regulators
• A fundamental relation between predictor identification and power spectrum estimation
• The Fitting of Time-Series Models
• Testing for a unit root in time series regression
• On the stability and convergence of self-tuning control–virtual equivalent system approach
• On the error of prediction of a time series

This page was built for publication: A comparison between minimum variance control and other online compensation methods for specimen drift in transmission electron microscopy